4.6 Article

Spin-Cobordisms, Surgeries and Fermionic Modular Bootstrap

期刊

COMMUNICATIONS IN MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS
卷 401, 期 3, 页码 3169-3245

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00220-023-04710-z

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We study general fermionic quantum field theories with a global finite group symmetry G, focusing on the case of 2 dimensions and torus spacetime. The modular transformation properties of the partition functions are determined by the 't Hooft anomaly of G and fermion parity. For non-abelian G, the modular transformations can be directly determined from the corresponding 3D invertible topological quantum field theory (iTQFT) through inflow. We also explore the evaluation of the character map from the real representation ring of G to the group classifying anomalies.
We consider general fermionic quantum field theories with a global finite group symmetry G, focusing on the case of 2 dimensions and torus spacetime. The modular transformation properties of the family of partition functions with different backgrounds are determined by the 't Hooft anomaly of G and fermion parity. For a general possibly non-abelian G we provide a method to determine the modular transformations directly from the bulk 3d invertible topological quantum field theory (iTQFT) corresponding to the anomaly by inflow. We also describe a method of evaluating the character map from the real representation ring of G to the group which classifies anomalies. Physically the value of the map is given by the anomaly of free fermions in a given representation. We assume classification of the anomalies/iTQFTs by spin-cobordisms. As a byproduct, for all abelian symmetry groups G, we provide explicit combinatorial expressions for corresponding spin-bordism invariants in terms of surgery representation of arbitrary closed spin 3-manifolds. We work out the case of G = Z(2) in detail, and, as an application, we consider the constraints that 't Hooft anomaly puts on the spectrum of the infrared conformal field theory.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据