4.4 Article

Modifications of simple models of polymer blend compatibilization using block copolymer

期刊

COLLOID AND POLYMER SCIENCE
卷 301, 期 6, 页码 665-680

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00396-023-05081-6

关键词

Polymer blends; Compatibilization; Block copolymers; Flory-Huggins interaction parameter; Calculations

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Polymer blends can be made compatible by using block and graft copolymers that have blocks identical to, miscible with, or adhering to related components of the blend. Simple models of compatibilized blends, based on the work of Leibler and its modification by Retsos, have been extended. The modification, based on Noolandi and Hong's analysis of the mean field formula for a decrease in the interfacial tension, provides a higher amount of copolymer in the interfacial region and higher compatibilization efficiency than previous models. Contrary to previous theories, this modification predicts maximum compatibilization efficiency for copolymer blocks somewhat shorter than the homopolymers.
Polymer blends can be compatibilized using block and graft copolymers with blocks identical to, miscible with, or adhering to related components of the blend. The relatively simple models of compatibilized blends published in our preceding papers following up on the work of Leibler and its modification by Retsos, based on the comments of Noolandi, have now been extended. Our analysis of the mean field formula for a decrease in the interfacial tension by Noolandi and Hong resulted in further modification. This modification provides a higher amount of copolymer in the interfacial region and higher compatibilization efficiency than models used in our previous papers. In contrast to previous theories, it predicts maximum compatibilization efficiency for copolymer blocks somewhat shorter than the homopolymers. With respect to the Flory-Huggins interaction parameter, this calculated maximum reaches its lowest value for a certain value of the interaction parameter.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据