4.6 Article

Effects of Exercise on Cognition: The Finnish Alzheimer Disease Exercise Trial: A Randomized, Controlled Trial

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY
卷 64, 期 4, 页码 731-738

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jgs.14059

关键词

physical exercise; cognition; Alzheimer's disease; randomized controlled trial

资金

  1. Social Insurance Institution of Finland
  2. Central Union for the Welfare of the Aged
  3. Sohlberg Foundation
  4. King Gustaf V and Queen Victoria's Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ObjectivesTo examine whether a regular, long-term exercise program performed by individuals with Alzheimer's disease (AD) at home or as group-based exercise at an adult daycare center has beneficial effects on cognition; to examine secondary outcomes of a trial that has been published earlier. DesignRandomized, controlled trial. SettingCommunity. ParticipantsCommunity-dwelling dyads (N = 210) of individuals with AD and their spousal caregivers randomized into three groups. InterventionTwo types of intervention comprising customized home-based exercise (HE) and group-based exercise (GE), each twice a week for 1 year, were compared with a control group (CG) receiving usual community care. MeasurementsCognitive function was measured using the Clock Drawing Test (CDT), Verbal Fluency (VF), Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR), and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) at baseline and 3, 6, and 12 months of follow-up. ResultsExecutive function, measured using CDT, improved in the HE group, and changes in the score were significantly better than those of the CG at 12 months (adjusted for age, sex, and CDR, P = .03). All groups deteriorated in VF and MMSE score during the intervention, and no significant differences between the groups were detected at 12-month follow-up when analyses were adjusted for age, sex, and CDR. ConclusionRegular, long-term, customized HE improved the executive function of community-dwelling older people with memory disorders, but the effects were mild and were not observed in other domains of cognition.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据