4.3 Article

Acute effects of transcranial direct current stimulation combined with physical therapy on the balance and gait in individuals with Parkinson?s disease: A randomized controlled trial

期刊

CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY
卷 226, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2023.107604

关键词

Transcranial direct current stimulation; Non-invasive brain stimulation; Parkinson ?s disease; Gait; Balance

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The application methods of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in Parkinson's disease (PD) vary widely, making it difficult to determine the clinical effectiveness of tDCS on PD. This study aimed to investigate the acute effects of tDCS on balance and gait in PD patients when applied to different targets (Cz or C3-Cz-C4) combined with physical therapy. The results showed that one session of tDCS, regardless of targeting Cz or C3-Cz-C4, did not significantly improve balance and gait compared to sham tDCS or educational lecture plus physiotherapy.
Application methods of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in Parkinson's disease (PD) are quite divergent making it difficult to define the clinical effectiveness of the tDCS on PD. Thus, the aim of this study was to verify the acute effects of tDCS when applied to different targets (Cz or C3-Cz-C4) combined to physical therapy to improve balance and gait in individuals with PD. A randomized controlled trial was conducted, with 50 individuals who were separated into four groups: 1) Real tDCS (Cz) + physical therapy, 2) Real tDCS (C3-Cz-C4) + physical therapy, 3) Sham tDCS + physical therapy and 4) Educational lecture + physical therapy. The current intensity was 2 mA, applied for 20 min. For the instrumental assessment of balance and gait, the 3D motion analysis system was used. For the biomechanical analysis of gait, three different conditions were per-formed: normal gait, dual task gait and obstacle gait. For balance analysis, the following positions were utilized: Romberg with eyes opened, Romberg with eyes closed, Tandem with eyes opened and Tandem with eyes closed. All evaluations were performed pre-intervention, post-intervention (immediately at the end of the intervention) and were followed-up on (24 h after the end of the intervention). No statistically significant differences were found for all gait and balance outcomes when considering the interaction between time (pre, post and follow-up assessments) versus group (Education, Sham, Cz and C3-Cz-C4). In conclusion, it was found that one session of tDCS, stimulating Cz or C3-Cz-C4 combined with physical therapy, was not effective in improving the balance and gait in people with PD as compared to sham tDCS or educational lecture plus physiotherapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据