4.3 Article

Variations in Penile Cancer Management: Results From the Global Society of Rare Genitourinary Tumors Survey

期刊

CLINICAL GENITOURINARY CANCER
卷 21, 期 3, 页码 376-382

出版社

CIG MEDIA GROUP, LP
DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2023.03.001

关键词

GSRGT; rare tumors; divergence; genital; carcinoma; penis; questionnaire

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Given the rarity of penile cancer, the Global Society of Rare Genitourinary Tumors (GSRGT) conducted a survey to identify the global variations in disease presentation and various aspects of its management. The results of this survey help identify research areas for multinational collaborative efforts which is a key mission of the GSRGT.
Given the rarity of penile cancer, the Global Society of Rare Genitourinary Tumors (GSRGT) conducted a survey to identify the global variations in disease presentation and various aspects of its management. The results of this survey help identify research areas for multinational collaborative efforts which is a key mission of the Introduction: There is paucity of evidence and consensus on various aspects of management of penile cancer (PeCa), which is intuitive considering the rarity of this disease. We present here the details of an online survey conducted by the Global Society of Rare Genito-urinary Tumors (GSRGT) with the aim of capturing the variations in PeCa care across different regions of the world. Materials and Methods: An online questionnaire was developed by experts within the GSRGT and then circulated via email in English and Spanish versions to clinicians dealing with PeCa. Respondents were allowed 8 weeks to reply. Results: We received 102 responses; the majority of them were from South America (37.2%) followed by North America and Asia (17.6% each). Only 11.7% of the respondents treated more than 25 patients with PeCa annually. Total penectomy is performed by 21.5% of the respondents in > 50% of their patients. Less than a fifth of the experts (19.6%) responded that > 50% of their patients are clinically node-negative (cN0) at presentation. For intermediate-risk cN0 patients (T1 G2 cancer), about a third of the experts chose surveillance. For invasive inguinal staging, the options of Dynamic Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy (DSNB), Modified Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection (MILD), Superficial Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection (SILD), and Video-Endoscopic Inguinal Lymphadenectomy (VEIL) were chosen by 28.4%, 26.4%, 31.3%, and 13.7% of the respondents respectively. Considerable variation was seen in the worldwide use of these techniques. For clinically node-positive patients, respondents were in favor of giving adjuvant chemotherapy instead of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, except for cN3 patients. Conclusion: The results of this questionnaire objectified the variations in global practices in the management of PeCa. This serves as the baseline information which can help pr ior itize research areas for multinational collaborative efforts, a key mission of the GSRGT.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据