4.7 Review

Tumor-Agnostic Precision Medicine from the AACR GENIE Database: Clinical Implications

期刊

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
卷 29, 期 15, 页码 2753-2760

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-23-0090

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Biomarker-driven cancer therapy has revolutionized precision oncology by identifying tissue-agnostic targets and developing therapeutics with pan-cancer efficacy. So far, FDA has approved five molecular biomarkers for targeted therapies and immunotherapies, including mutations in BRAFV600E, RET fusions, NTRK fusions, high TMB, and dMMR/MSI-High.
◥ Biomarker-driven cancer therapy has revolutionized precision oncology. With a better understanding of tumor biology, tissue-agnostic targets have been characterized and explored, which ultimately led to therapeutics with pan-cancer efficacy. To date, five molecular biomarkers have obtained FDA tissue-agnostic approval for targeted therapies and immunotherapies. Those include BRAFV600E mutations, RET fusions, NTRK fusions, high tumor mutation burden (TMB), and deficient mismatch repair/ high microsatellite instability (dMMR/MSI-High). Herein, we have used data from AACR project GENIE to explore the clinico-genomic landscape of these alterations. AACR GENIE is a publicly accessible registry of genomic data from multiple collaborating cancer centers. Current database (version 13.0) includes sequencing data of 168,423 samples collected from patients with different cancers. We were able to identify BRAFV600E, RET fusions, NTRK fusions, and high TMB in 2.9%, 1.6%, 1.5%, and 15.2% of pan-cancer samples, respectively. In this article, we describe the distribution of those tissue-agnostic targets among different cancer types. In addition, we summarize the current prospect on the biology of these alterations and evidence on approved drugs, including pem-brolizumab, dostarilmab, larotrectinib, entrectinib, selpercatinib, and dabrafenib/trametinib combination.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据