4.6 Article

Mendelian randomization study on causal association of IL-6 signaling with pulmonary arterial hypertension

期刊

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/10641963.2023.2183963

关键词

IL-6; sIL-6R; PAH; Genome-wide association study; Mendelian randomization

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study reevaluated the genetic causal link between IL-6 signaling and PAH using genetic instrumental variants and publicly available PAH GWAS. The results showed that genetically increased IL-6 signaling reduced the risk of PAH, while genetically increased sIL-6 R increased the risk of PAH.
Background A recent Mendelian randomization (MR) did not support an effect of the lead interleukin-6 receptor (IL-6 R) variant on risk of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Thus, we used two sets of genetic instrumental variants (IVs) and publicly available PAH genome-wide association studies (GWAS) to reassess the genetic causal link between IL-6 signaling and PAH. Methods Six independent IL-6 signaling and 34 independent soluble IL-6 receptor (sIL-6 R) genetic IVs from recent MR reports and PAH GWAS including 162,962 European individuals were used to perform this two-sample MR study. Results We found that as IL-6 signaling genetically increased, the risk of PAH reduced using IVW (odds ratio [OR] = 0.023, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.0013-0.393; p = .0093) and weighted median (OR = 0.033, 95% CI: 0.0024-0.467; p = .0116). Otherwise, as sIL-6 R genetically increased, the risk of PAH increased using IVW (OR = 1.34, 95% CI: 1.16-1.56; p = .0001), weighted median (OR = 1.36, 95% CI: 1.10-1.68; p = .005), MR-Egger (OR = 1.43, 95% CI: 1.05-1.94; p = .03), and weighted mode (OR = 1.35, 95% CI for OR: 1.12-1.63; p = .0035). Conclusion Our analysis suggested the causal link between genetically increased sIL-6 R and increased risk of PAH and between genetically increased IL-6 signaling and reduced risk of PAH. Thus, higher sIL-6 R levels may be a risk factor for patients with PAH, whereas higher IL-6 signaling may be a protective factor for patients with PAH.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据