4.6 Article

Association Between Accelerated Multimorbidity and Age-Related Cognitive Decline in Older Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging Participants without Dementia

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY
卷 64, 期 5, 页码 965-972

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jgs.14092

关键词

multimorbidity; cognition; cognitive decline; aging; older adults

资金

  1. Intramural Research Program of the National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Aging (NIA)
  2. NIA [03-AG-0325]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ObjectivesTo explore the association between rate of physical health deterioration, operationalized as rising multimorbidity overtime, and longitudinal decline in cognitive function in older adults without dementia. DesignLongitudinal (Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging (BLSA)). SettingCommunity. ParticipantsBLSA participants aged 65 and older followed for an average of 3 years and free of dementia or mild cognitive impairment (MCI) at baseline and follow-up (N = 756). MeasurementsStandardized neurocognitive tests evaluating mental status, memory, executive function, processing speed, and verbal fluency were administered. Multimorbidity was assessed at each visit as number of diagnosed chronic diseases from a predefined list. Faster accumulation of chronic diseases was defined as upper quartile of rate of change in number of diseases over time (0.25 diseases/year). ResultsFaster accumulation of chronic diseases was significantly associated with greater rate of decline on the Category (P = .01) and Letter (P = .01) Fluency Tests. Similar trends were also found for the Trail-Making Test Parts A (P = .08) and B (P = .07); no association was found with rate of change in visual and verbal memory. ConclusionAlthough further investigations are required to validate the results and fully understand the underlying mechanisms, these findings suggest that accelerated deterioration of physical health is associated with accelerated decline with aging in specific cognitive domains in older adults without dementia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据