4.6 Article

Biaxial tensile behavior of Ti-6Al-4V under proportional loading

期刊

CHINESE JOURNAL OF AERONAUTICS
卷 36, 期 5, 页码 344-362

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.cja.2023.03.016

关键词

Biaxial tensile testing; Inverse analysis; Strengthening behavior; Ti-6Al-4V; Yield locus

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper characterizes the biaxial tensile behavior of isotropic Ti-6Al-4 V using a novel cruciform specimen. The Digital Image Correlation technique is applied to determine strain distribution, and an Inverse Analysis approach is used to determine the true stresses during biaxial tensile tests. The results show that the Cazacu criterion accurately describes the initial yield locus, while the Mises criterion predicts the strengthening behavior of Ti-6Al-4 V in the first quadrant of the principal stress space more accurately.
The biaxial tensile behavior of isotropic Ti-6Al-4 V is characterized in this paper. A novel cruciform specimen was designed and optimized to achieve uniform stress and strain distribution within the gauge area. Biaxial tensile tests were conducted at three different loading ratios by the biaxial testing machine. The Digital Image Correlation (DIC) technique was applied to determine strain distribution, and a high-speed camera was employed to record the fracture process. An Inverse Analysis (IA) approach with a combined experimental and numerical method was proposed to determine the true stresses at the gauge section of the specimen during biaxial tensile tests. The results indicate that the initial yield locus can be described by the Cazacu criterion accurately, whereas the Mises criterion can predict better the strengthening behavior of Ti-6Al-4 V in the first quadrant in the principal stress space.(c) 2023 Production and hosting by Elsevier Ltd. on behalf of Chinese Society of Aeronautics and Astronautics. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据