4.5 Article

Effects of Edge Functionalization of Nanographenes with Small Aromatic Systems

期刊

CHEMPHYSCHEM
卷 24, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cphc.202300066

关键词

graphene; graphene quantum dot; nanographene; polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon; edge modification

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effects of edge functionalization on the physical properties of nanographenes (NGs) were computationally studied, demonstrating that while the structures of the model NGs are not sensitive to edge functionalization, the magnetic and electronic properties are. Edge functionalization narrowed the H-L gap and induced a redshift of the photoluminescence band by promoting pi conjugation. The calculations further confirmed the contribution of charge transfer to the absorption spectra.
Regulation of the physical properties of nanographenes (NGs) by edge functionalization is an active research area. We conducted a computational study of the effects of edge functionalization on the physical properties of NGs. The computed NGs were models of experimentally obtained NGs and composed of a C-174 carbon framework with one to four 3,5-dimethylnaphthalene units on the edge. The effects were assessed structurally, magnetically, and electronically by the least square planarity index, harmonic oscillator model of aromaticity, nucleus-independent chemical shift, and HOMO-LUMO (H-L) gaps. Density functional theory calculations indicate that although the structures of the model NGs are not very sensitive to edge functionalization, but the magnetic and electronic properties are. The installed substituents narrowed the H-L gap and induced a redshift of the photoluminescence (PL) band by the pi conjugation between NG and the substituent. These results are consistent with the extension of the absorption band and the redshift of the PL bands of the experimentally modified NGs. Furthermore, the calculations confirmed the contribution of the charge transfer character to the absorption spectra.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据