4.6 Article

First Example of 1,2,5-Oxadiazole-Based Hypergolic Ionic Liquids: A New Class of Potential Energetic Fuels

期刊

CHEMISTRY-A EUROPEAN JOURNAL
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/chem.202300948

关键词

energetic materials; explosives; furoxan; hypergolic fuels; ionic liquids

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Liquid energetic fuels with improved properties, synthesized in this study, were evaluated for their physicochemical properties. The results showed that the synthesized compounds had good thermal stabilities and experimental densities. Particularly, the 1,2,5-oxadiazole-based ionic liquids exhibited high combined nitrogen-oxygen contents, detonation velocities comparable to TNT, and better combustion performance than the benchmark compound 2-hydroxyethylhydrazinium nitrate. Due to their hypergolicity with H2O2 in the presence of a catalyst and insensitivity to impact, these synthesized ionic liquids have great application potential for space technologies.
The development of liquid energetic fuels with improved properties is an important topic in space propulsion technologies. In this manuscript, a series of energetic ionic liquids incorporating a 1,2,5-oxadiazole ring and nitrate, dicyanamide or dinitramide anion was synthesized and their physicochemical properties were evaluated. The synthesized compounds were fully characterized and were found to have good thermal stabilities (up to 219 & DEG;C) and experimental densities (1.21-1.47 g cm(-3)). Advantageously, 1,2,5-oxadiazole-based ionic liquids have high combined nitrogen-oxygen contents (up to 64.4 %), while their detonation velocities are on the level of known explosive TNT, and combustion performance exceeds those of benchmark 2-hydroxyethylhydrazinium nitrate. Considering the established hypergolicity with H2O2 in the presence of a catalyst, and insensitivity to impact, synthesized ionic liquids have strong application potential as energetic fuels for space technologies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据