4.6 Article

Bis[1]benzothieno[1,4]thiaborins as a Platform for BODIPY Singlet Oxygen Photosensitizers

期刊

CHEMISTRY-A EUROPEAN JOURNAL
卷 29, 期 36, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/chem.202300680

关键词

boron; heterocycles; luminescence; photooxidation; structure-property relationship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A synthetic approach to two regioisomeric pi-electron extended [1,4]thiaborins annulated with two benzothiophene units has been developed. The obtained boracycles exhibit different electronic properties reflected in their aromatic characters, boron Lewis acidity, and UV-vis spectroscopic behavior. The spiro thiaborin-BODIPY complexes show excellent photocatalytic performance as singlet oxygen photosensitizers with high singlet oxygen quantum yields and full conversion of organic substrates.
A synthetic approach to two regioisomeric pi-electron extended [1,4]thiaborins annulated with two benzothiophene units has been developed. The central thiaborin rings of the boracycles obtained exhibit different electronic properties; this is reflected in their different aromatic characters, boron Lewis acidity and UV-vis spectroscopic behavior. Thiaborins were converted to boron dipyrromethene (BODIPY) complexes. Their emission spectra exhibit two distinct bands resulting from (LE)-L-1 and (CT)-C-1 transitions. Strong near-infrared phosphorescence in Zeonex thin films at 77 K indicates efficient intersystem crossing and the formation of triplet states. Separation of HOMO and LUMO orbitals between boracyclic and BODIPY moieties facilitates electron transfer to a (CT)-C-1 state followed by a transition to the (LE)-L-3 triplet state located on the ligand. These unique properties of spiro thiaborin-BODIPY complexes were explored for their application as singlet-oxygen photosensitizers. They show excellent photocatalytic performance with singlet oxygen quantum yields reaching 77 % and full conversion of the model organic substrate achieved after 1.5 h with only 0.05 % mol catalyst load.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据