4.6 Article

Ferrier/Aza-Wacker/Epoxidation/Glycosylation (FAWEG) Sequence to Access 1,2-Trans 3-Amino-3-deoxyglycosides

期刊

CHEMISTRY-A EUROPEAN JOURNAL
卷 29, 期 17, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/chem.202203987

关键词

Ferrier rearrangement; glycals; glycosylation; palladium; synthetic method

向作者/读者索取更多资源

3-Amino-3-deoxyglycosides are important nitrogen-containing sugars, with many important ones having a 1,2-trans configuration. The synthesis of 3-amino-3-deoxyglycosyl donors that can form a 1,2-trans glycosidic linkage is a significant challenge due to their biological applications. This work presents a new sequence involving Ferrier rearrangement and subsequent aza-Wacker cyclization for the rapid synthesis of orthogonally protected 3-amino-3-deoxyglycals. Additionally, the epoxidation/glycosylation of a 3-amino-3-deoxygalactal derivative was successfully achieved with high yield and diastereoselectivity, demonstrating FAWEG as a new approach for accessing 1,2-trans 3-amino-3-deoxyglycosides.
3-Amino-3-deoxyglycosides constitute an essential class of nitrogen-containing sugars. Among them, many important 3-amino-3-deoxyglycosides possess a 1,2-trans relationship. In view of their numerous biological applications, the synthesis of 3-amino-3-deoxyglycosyl donors giving rise to a 1,2-trans glycosidic linkage is thus an important challenge. Even though glycals are highly polyvalent donors, the synthesis and reactivity of 3-amino-3-deoxyglycals have been little studied. In this work, we describe a new sequence, involving a Ferrier rearrangement and subsequent aza-Wacker cyclization that allows the rapid synthesis of orthogonally protected 3-amino-3-deoxyglycals. Finally a 3-amino-3-deoxygalactal derivative was submitted for the first time to an epoxidation/glycosylation with high yield and great diastereoselectivity, highlighting FAWEG (Ferrier/Aza-Wacker/Epoxidation/Glycosylation) as a new approach to access 1,2-trans 3-amino-3-deoxyglycosides.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据