4.5 Article

New Polyketide and Sesquiterpenoid Derivatives from the Magellan Seamount-Derived Fungus Penicillium rubens AS-130

期刊

CHEMISTRY & BIODIVERSITY
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cbdv.202300229

关键词

Magellan Seamount-derived fungus; Penicillium rubens; sesquiterpenoid; polyketide; antimicrobial activity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rubenpolyketone A (1), a new polyketide with a unique carbon skeleton, and a new linear sesquiterpenoid, chermesiterpenoid D (2), were isolated from the fungus Penicillium rubens AS-130. Seven known secondary metabolites (3-9) were also identified. The structures of the compounds were determined through NMR and mass spectroscopic analysis, and the absolute configurations of the new compounds were elucidated using quantum mechanical (QM)-NMR and time-dependent density functional (TDDFT) ECD calculation approaches. Chermesiterpenoids B (3) and C (4) exhibited potent inhibitory activities against Vibrio anguillarum, with MIC values of 0.5 and 1 μg/mL, respectively. Chermesin F (6) showed activity against Escherichia coli, with a MIC value of 1 μg/mL.
Rubenpolyketone A (1), a polyketide featuring a new carbon skeleton having cyclohexenone condensed with a methyl octenone chain and a new linear sesquiterpenoid, chermesiterpenoid D (2), together with seven known secondary metabolites (3-9) were isolated and identified from the Magellan Seamount-derived fungus Penicillium rubens AS-130. Their structures were determined based on detailed analysis of NMR and mass spectroscopic data and the absolute configurations of these two new compounds were elucidated by the combination of quantum mechanical (QM)-NMR and time-dependent density functional (TDDFT) ECD calculation approaches. Chermesiterpenoids B (3) and C (4) showed potent inhibitory activities against the aquatic pathogen Vibrio anguillarum with MIC values of 0.5 and 1 mu g/mL, respectively, while chermesin F (6) exhibited activity against Escherichia coli with MIC value of 1 mu g/mL.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据