4.4 Article

Determination of trace aluminum using resonance Rayleigh scattering method with chrome azurol S and hexadecyl trimethyl ammonium bromide system

期刊

CHEMICAL PAPERS
卷 77, 期 9, 页码 5473-5479

出版社

SPRINGER INT PUBL AG
DOI: 10.1007/s11696-023-02878-1

关键词

Resonance Rayleigh scattering spectra; Aluminum ion; Chrome azurol S; Cetyltrimethylammonium bromide

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The resonance Rayleigh scattering spectra of the Al(III)-chromium azure S-cetyltrimethyl ammonium bromide system were studied in this experiment. The optimal experimental conditions, interference of other ions, and reaction mechanism were investigated. The results showed that Al(III) forms an anion with chromium azure S and forms ionic association with cetyltrimethyl ammonium bromide, increasing the scattering intensity. The mass concentration of Al(III) showed a linear relationship with the scattering intensity in a certain range with good accuracy.
In this experiment, the resonance Rayleigh scattering spectra of the Al(III)-chromium azure S-cetyltrimethyl ammonium bromide system were investigated. The optimal experimental conditions of the system were optimized, the interference of other ions to the system was investigated, and the reaction mechanism was discussed. The results show that: Aluminum(III) forms an anion with chromium azure S in a weakly acidic medium and then forms ionic association with cetyltrimethyl ammonium bromide under electrostatic and hydrophobic effects, which increases the resonance Rayleigh scattering intensity of the system. The mass concentration of Al(III) at 598.1 nm showed a good linear relationship with the resonance Rayleigh scattering intensity in the range of 0.02-0.16 mu g/mL with the correlation coefficient of 0.9989 and the detection limit of 1.8 ng/mL. The relative standard deviation (RSDS, n = 6) was less than 1.1%, and the spiked recoveries were in the range of 93.5-100.8%. The measured values were consistent with atomic absorption spectrometry.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据