4.6 Article

Thermochemical model for evaluating CO2 regeneration energy for amine absorbents

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE
卷 268, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2022.118388

关键词

Carbon dioxide capture; Amine absorbent; Regeneration energy; Equilibrium constant; Enthalpy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We developed a thermochemical model to evaluate the CO2 regeneration energies in aqueous solutions of MEA, DEA, AMP, and IPAE. The regeneration heat includes reaction heat, sensible heat, and vaporization heat. We calculated the reaction heat using our model and determined the concentrations of all chemical species in the CO2 absorption and release states. The contribution of protonation reaction is significant in sterically hindered amines AMP and IPAE, while both protonation and carbamate hydrolysis play important roles in MEA and DEA. Sensible heat dominates the regeneration heat compared to reaction and vaporization heats.
We present a thermochemical model for evaluating CO2 regeneration energies for aqueous solutions of monoethanolamine (MEA), diethanolamine (DEA), 2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol (AMP), and 2-(isopropylamino)ethanol (IPAE). The regeneration heat consists of the reaction heat, the sensible heat, and the vaporization heat. We calculated the reaction heat using a thermochemical model. We calculated the concentrations of all chemical species present in the CO2 absorption state at 40 degrees C and the CO2 release state at 120 degrees C. We calculated the reaction heat by summing enthalpies of associated reactions and reacted molar quantities derived from the concentration changes between the absorption and release states. For sterically hindered amines AMP and IPAE, the contribution of the protonation reaction to the reaction heat is large, whereas the contributions of protonation and carbamate hydrolysis are large for MEA and DEA. In the regeneration heat, the sensible heat is much larger than the reaction and vapor-ization heats.(c) 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据