4.6 Article

Mo promoted Ni-ZrO2 co-precipitated catalysts for green diesel production

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE
卷 270, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2023.118540

关键词

Green diesel; Co-precipitated catalysts; Nickel catalysts; Zirconium oxide; Biofuels; Sunflower oil; Triglycerides; Mo-promoted catalysts

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The promoting action of molybdenum species in high nickel loading Ni-ZrO2 co-precipitated catalysts was investigated. Mo addition nearly doubled the green diesel yield by accelerating the hydrodeoxygenation pathway. Increasing the activation temperature further enhanced the catalytic efficiency of the promoted catalysts, resulting in a 70.1% green diesel yield. The promoting action of molybdenum was attributed to the increase of specific surface area and the synergy between oxygen vacancies on the well-dispersed Mo-species and nickel surface sites.
The promoting action of Mo-species was studied for Ni-ZrO2 co-precipitated catalysts with high nickel loading used in the transformation of sunflower oil into green diesel. The catalysts were thoroughly characterized and evaluated using a high-pressure semi-batch reactor. The significant promoting action of molybdenum species was clearly demonstrated concerning the Ni-ZrO2 catalysts as Mo addition resulted in almost duplication of green diesel yield (from 35.2 to 68.4 %). This is manifested through the acceleration of the hydrodeoxygenation pathway of the reaction network. The increase of the activation temperature increases further the catalytic efficiency of the promoted catalysts resulting in 70.1 % green diesel yield. The promoting action of molybdenum was partly attributed to the increase of the specific surface area and the metallic nickel surface brought about by molybdenum but, principally, to a synergy between the oxygen vacancies developed on the very well dispersed Mo-species - and the nickel surface sites. (c) 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据