4.7 Article

A promising non-fullerene acceptor for near-infrared organic photodetectors operating with low dark current and high response speed

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 464, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2023.142633

关键词

Organic photodetector; Non-fullerene acceptor; Dark current; Near-infrared; Specific detectivity; Response speed

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By tuning the band gaps of their active layer materials, organic photodetectors (OPDs) can display good responses in the near-infrared (NIR) region, making them useful for applications in biomedical imaging and optical communication. In this study, we used 3TT-FIC, a non-fullerene acceptor (NFA), to develop OPDs capable of operating with extremely low dark currents and high response speeds. By fine tuning the blend ratio of the donor (PM6) and acceptor (3TT-FIC), we obtained an OPD that operated at a low dark current (7.04 x 10-10 A/ cm2) at -1 V with a high value of specific detectivity (D*) (2.6 x 1013 Jones) at the wavelength of 850 nm. We also discuss the wider applicability of 3TT-FIC and its potential as an NFA in NIR OPDs.
By tuning the band gaps of their active layer materials, organic photodetectors (OPDs) can display good responses in the near-infrared (NIR) region, making them useful for applications in biomedical imaging and optical communication. Nevertheless, NIR OPDs have tended to suffer from low specific detectivity (D*), due to a high dark current. In this study, we employed 3TT-FIC, a non-fullerene acceptor (NFA), to develop OPDs capable of operating with extremely low dark currents and high response speeds. After fine tuning the blend ratio of the donor (PM6) and acceptor (3TT-FIC), we obtained an OPD that operated at a low dark current (7.04 x 10-10 A/ cm2) at -1 V with a high value of D* (2.6 x 1013 Jones) at the wavelength of 850 nm. We also describe the wider applicability of 3TT-FIC and its good potential for applications as an NFA in NIR OPDs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据