4.7 Article

Bifunctional catalyst of CuMn-HZSM-5 for selective catalytic reduction of NO and CO oxidation under oxygen atmosphere

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 462, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2023.142113

关键词

NH3-SCR; CO oxidation; CuMn-HZSM-5; Synergistic reaction mechanism

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Simultaneous removal of NOx and CO from steel sintering using mixed CuMn-HZSM-5 catalyst was studied. The optimized catalyst showed excellent performance with high NO and CO conversion rates. The CuMn active component and CO introduction played important roles in improving the performance of the catalyst.
Simultaneous removal of NOx and CO from steel sintering has attracted great attention because it is difficult to balance the catalyst reducibility and surface acidity merely using metal oxides or zeolite catalysts. In this study, a mixed CuMn-HZSM-5 catalyst was prepared via an impregnation method. The optimized sample exhibited excellent performance with 90% NO conversion and 100% CO conversion at 175 degrees C. The activity window of the catalyst was coincident with the actual demand of sintering flue gas control at 150-250 degrees C The active component CuMn suppressed the excessive Lewis acid sites on the zeolite support for NH3 adsorption, while the reducibility of the catalyst also decreased compared with that of pure CuMn metal oxides. This synergistic effect was beneficial for the reduction of NH3 nonselective oxidation with O-2. In addition, both the DFT and DRIFTS results revealed that NO conversion was improved by CO introduction at low temperature, since NO could adsorb on the CO-preadsorbed sites for the reduction to N-2 via the O atoms of Mn(3)c sites, i.e., adsorbed CO could also serve as a reductant to reduce NO to N-2, which provides another reaction pathway in SCR reactions. Moreover, the NO2 and N2O2 species were observed in the spectra as key intermediates to oxidize CO to CO2, which are also the promoters for CO control.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据