4.7 Article

Toluene and 2-propanol mixture oxidation over Mn2O3 catalysts: Study of inhibition/promotion effects by in-situ DRIFTS

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 470, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2023.144114

关键词

Manganese oxides-based catalysts; VOCs binary mixture catalytic oxidation; In-situ surface measurements; Reaction mechanisms

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Three different Mn2O3 catalysts were synthesized and tested for oxidation reactions of toluene and 2-propanol in both single and binary component mixtures. The catalytic activity was influenced by factors such as specific surface area, reducibility, and active surface-oxygen species. The presence of both toluene and 2-propanol in the mixture promoted the catalytic activity, as indicated by lower reaction temperatures and shifted acetone production.
Three Mn2O3 catalysts were synthetized by different methods, characterized and tested in toluene and 2-propanol (iPrOH) oxidation in single and binary component mixture. In single VOC media, the catalytic activity was strongly influenced by the specific surface area, low-temperature reducibility and active surface-oxygen species. In the binary VOCs mixture oxidation, light-off curves were shifted to lower temperatures, suggesting a promoting effect on the catalytic activity for toluene and iPrOH oxidation. The acetone production in binary mixture was also shifted to lower temperatures. The obtained results were rationalized based on the different polarity of the VOCs, the available adsorbed oxygen and the exothermic character of the VOCs combustion. These promoting effects were pointed out by in-situ DRIFTS measurements, in which the pre-adsorption of any of these two VOCs affected the adsorption/reaction of the other. For the first time, in-situ DRIFTS has been applied to elucidate the reaction mechanisms of the oxidation of toluene/2-propanol mixture on Mn2O3, which allowed to correlate the surface phenomena and the catalytic performance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据