4.7 Review

Advances in biomass-derived electrode materials for energy storage and circular carbon economy

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 470, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2023.144234

关键词

Zero-waste biorefinery; Biomass-based electrode; Supercapacitor; Lithium-ion battery; Sodium-ion battery; Circular carbon economy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

With the exacerbation of the climate crisis, there is a growing momentum in the development of zero-waste biorefineries that efficiently utilize all biomass components for valuable fuels, materials, and chemicals. However, the challenge lies in utilizing biorefinery waste, particularly lignin, due to its recalcitrance. This review explores the potential use of biomass-derived electrode materials for energy storage devices and discusses recent advances in biomass-derived supercapacitors, lithium-ion, and sodium-ion batteries.
As the climate crisis intensifies, the development of zero-waste biorefineries, which fully utilize all biomass components for value-added fuels, materials, and chemicals, has gained momentum. Traditional biorefineries primarily employ cellulosic and hemicellulosic elements of biomass as carbon sources for microbial fermentation. However, utilizing biorefinery waste, including lignin (i.e., residual biomass), poses a significant challenge for achieving a circular bioeconomy due to its recalcitrance. Exploring innovative approaches for utilizing residual biomass is crucial to address this issue. This review examines the potential of biomass-derived electrode materials for energy storage devices (ESDs). We introduce suitable biomass sources for electrode fabrication and discuss the requirements of electrode materials for ESDs. Furthermore, we delve into recent advances in biomass-derived supercapacitors, lithium-ion, and sodium-ion batteries. The findings presented in this review offer valuable insights for fostering a low-carbon circular bioeconomy and improving our response to the climate crisis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据