4.7 Article

Enhanced extraction of brominated flame retardants from e-waste plastics

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 469, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2023.144126

关键词

Brominated flame retardant; Microwave; Ultrasound; Extraction; Dissolution and reprecipitation; E-waste plastics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) is a widely used thermoplastic found in waste electronic and electrical goods. The recycling of e-waste plastics often contains brominated flame retardants, such as Tetrabromobisphenol A (TBBPA), which are intentionally added to the plastics. Three processes - microwave assisted extraction (MAE), ultrasound assisted extraction (UAE), and dissolution reprecipitation (DR) - were compared to find the most efficient method for TBBPA-free plastics recovery. MAE was found to be superior in terms of quantity and quality of recovered plastics, achieving a maximum extraction efficiency of 95.81%.
Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) is a high utility engineering thermoplastic, abundantly present in waste electronic and electrical goods. The demand for this plastic resin increases continuously with rapid industrial growth across the world. During the recycling of e-waste plastics, it is a common occurrence to find brominated flame retardants, such as Tetrabromobisphenol A (TBBPA) in the plastic. These flame retardants are intentionally added to the plastics as additives. Three processes were investigated to find the optimum solvent/antisolvent combinations, process parameters for the efficient recovery of TBBPA free plastics: microwave assisted extraction (MAE), ultrasound assisted extraction (UAE), and dissolution reprecipitation (DR). Rigorous solvent screening was carried out for both TBBPA and ABS using Hansen Solubility Parameters (HSP), and their interactions with the solvents were investigated with a molecular based Conductor like Screening Model for Realistic Solvents (COSMO-RS) software platform. A 4:1 (v/v) solvent mixture of 1-propanol and heptane was found to be ideal for the solid-liquid extraction process. The optimal extraction conditions (Temperature = 110 - 130 degrees C, time = 60 to 70 min solid/liquid ratio of 0.025) in MAE were predicted using machine learning based Support Vector Regression (SVR) technique. MAE was found to be superior to UAE and DR processes in terms of quantity and quality of recovered plastics. The maximum extraction efficiencies for TBBPA removal were achieved with MAE, UAE, and DR processes at 95.81%, 93.92%, and 98.15%, respectively. However, the DR process had a relatively lower plastic recovery.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据