4.6 Article

Theoretical Investigation of the Mechanism of the Hock Rearrangement with InCl3 as Catalyst

期刊

CHEMCATCHEM
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cctc.202300578

关键词

Peroxides; Oxidative cleavage; Rearrangement; Oxacycles; DFT study

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Hock rearrangement is an acid catalyzed reaction involving organic hydroperoxides and resulting in an oxidative cleavage of adjacent C-C bonds. Its mechanism has not been studied in detail. In this work, we conducted a theoretical study on the Hock rearrangement using InCl3 as a Lewis acid catalyst. We aimed to understand the mechanism of this reaction and rationalize the influence of substrate electronic properties. Our investigation revealed the co-existence of several energetically close reaction pathways and suggested that In2Cl6 species coordinated to the substrate play a central role in the catalytic cycle.
The Hock rearrangement is an acid catalyzed reaction involving organic hydroperoxides and resulting in an oxidative cleavage of adjacent C-C bonds. It has significant industrial applications, like the production of phenol (cumene process), but it remains scarcely used in organic synthesis. In addition, its detailed mechanism has never been studied. Thus, we report herein a theoretical study of the Hock rearrangement, using InCl3 as a Lewis acid catalyst. The aim of this work was to fully understand the mechanism of this fundamental reaction, and to rationalize the influence of the substrate electronic properties on the reaction outcome. Furthermore, the structure of the active indium(III) catalyst interacting with the peroxide substrate was investigated, revealing the co-existence of several energetically close reaction pathways. The coordinated monomeric form of the Lewis acid emerges as the most active catalyst compared to dimeric species. However, we show that In2Cl6 species coordinated to the substrate are central in this catalytic cycle, primarily serving as a reservoir of active monomeric species.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据