4.4 Article

Conserved Active Site Architecture Between Bacterial Cellulose and Chitin Synthases

期刊

CHEMBIOCHEM
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cbic.202300388

关键词

bacterial cellulose synthase; bacterial chitin synthase; active site; architecture; evolution

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Glycosyltransferases (GTs) are important enzymes that catalyze the formation of glycosidic bonds between donor and acceptor molecules. In this study, it was found that bacterial cellulose and chitin synthases share a conserved active site motif, despite their low sequence and structural similarities. This discovery challenges the current understanding that these enzymes are substrate specific, and opens up new possibilities for future experimental assessments.
Glycosyltransferases (GTs) are a large and diverse group of enzymes responsible for catalyzing the formation of a glycosidic bond between a donor molecule, usually a monosaccharide, and a wide range of acceptor molecules, thus, playing critical roles in various essential biological processes. Chitin and cellulose synthases are two inverting processive integral membrane GTs, belonging to the type-2 family involved in the biosynthesis of chitin and cellulose, respectively. Herein, we report that bacterial cellulose and chitin synthases share an E-D-D-ED-QRW-TK active site common motif that is spatially co-localized. This motif is conserved among distant bacterial evolutionary species despite their low amino acid sequence and structural similarities between them. This theoretical framework offers a new perspective to the current view that bacterial cellulose and chitin synthases are substrate specific and that chitin and cellulose are organism specific. It lays the ground for future in vivo and in silico experimental assessment of cellulose synthase catalytic promiscuity against uridine diphosphate N-acetylglucosamine and chitin synthase against uridine diphosphate glucose, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据