4.6 Article

Loss of age-related laminar differentiation of intracortical myelin in bipolar disorder

期刊

CEREBRAL CORTEX
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhad052

关键词

bipolar disorder; cortical layers; cortical myelin; neuroimaging

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Age-related changes in intracortical myelin differ between bipolar disorder (BD) and healthy controls (HC), particularly at varying cortical depths. This study compared BD and HC participants and found that only HC exhibited age-related changes at certain cortical depths. These findings may suggest abnormal brain structure in BD and lifetime disease burden.
Age-related changes of intracortical myelin in bipolar disorder (BD) have been observed to deviate from the quadratic age curve observed in healthy controls (HC), but it is unclear if this holds at varying cortical depths. From BD (n = 44; age range = 17.6-45.5 years) and HC (n = 60; age range = 17.1-45.8 years) participants, we collected 3T T1-weighted (T1w) images with strong intracortical contrast. Signal values were sampled from 3 equivolume cortical depths. Linear mixed models were used to compare age-related changes in the T1w signal between depths and between groups at each depth. In HC, the age-related changes were significantly different between the superficial one-fourth depth and the deeper depths in the right ventral somatosensory (t = -4.63; FDRp = 0.00025), left dorsomedial somatosensory (t = -3.16; FDRp = 0.028), left rostral ventral premotor (t = -3.16; FDRp = 0.028), and right ventral inferior parietal cortex (t = -3.29; FDRp = 0.028). BD participants exhibited no differences in the age-related T1w signal between depths. Illness duration was negatively correlated with the T1w signal at the one-fourth depth in the right anterior cingulate cortex (rACC; rho = -0.50; FDRp = 0.029). Physiological age-related and depth-specific variation in the T1w signal were not observed in BD. The T1w signal in the rACC may reflect lifetime disease burden in the disorder.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据