4.7 Article

3D concrete printing of eco-friendly geopolymer containing brick waste

期刊

CEMENT & CONCRETE COMPOSITES
卷 138, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2023.104943

关键词

Geopolymer concrete; Digital construction; Brick waste; Rheological properties; Porosity; Compressive strength

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the feasibility of alkali-activated brick waste powder as a binder for 3D printable geopolymer mixes. The effects of brick waste content on the fresh properties and hardened properties of the mixes were studied. The results showed that the fresh properties of the printable mixes improved with the addition of brick waste, while the hardened properties were affected by the content of brick waste.
This study investigates alkali-activated brick waste powder as the binder for developing 3D printable geopolymer mixes. The brick waste was used as a partial replacement to fly ash in geopolymer binders. The effect of brick waste content on the fresh properties of printable mixes, such as flow, setting time and rheological properties were investigated. Besides, the hardened properties of 3D printed brick waste geopolymer were evaluated with the varying brick waste content in the mix. The test results demonstrated that the fresh properties of 3D printable mixes were improved with the brick waste content in the mix. Compared to the control mix, the mixes containing brick waste displayed high yield strength and apparent viscosity at an early age. On the contrary, the hardened properties of compressive strength and interlayer strength of 3D printed concrete specimens were decreased with the high brick waste content; however, the incorporation of brick waste for up to 10% has enhanced the hardened properties. Finally, the sustainability assessment of brick waste geopolymer studied with embodied energy and carbon emission calculations reveals the proposed geopolymer concrete could reduce the embodied energy and carbon emission by up to 60-80%, compared to OPC concrete.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据