4.7 Review

Engineered transparent wood composites: a review

期刊

CELLULOSE
卷 30, 期 9, 页码 5447-5471

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10570-023-05239-z

关键词

Engineered transparent wood; Delignification; Polymer

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Wood is a versatile resource with unique properties that make it a valuable material for various applications. Engineered transparent wood (ETW) is a sustainable alternative to glass, offering excellent optical, thermal, and mechanical properties. ETW has the potential to be used in a wide range of applications, including construction and optics.
Wood is a versatile resource due to its inherent properties such as low density, good weight to strength ratio, unique hierarchical structure, microscale pores, and ease of processing, including its biodegradability and renewability. In the building and construction industry, engineered transparent wood (ETW) may serve as a sustainable replacement for glass which is environmentally unfriendly in its manufacture and application. Natural wood is non transparent due to its low optical transmittance, therefore, lignin and chromophores are modified or eliminated, and a polymer is infiltrated in order to achieve transparency. Engineered transparent wood (ETW) exhibits excellent optical properties (transmittance > 80%), high haze (haze > 70%), thermal insulation (thermal conductivity less than 0.23Wm(-1) K-1), unique hierarchical structure, good loadbearing performance with tough failure behaviour (no shattering) and ductility. These properties extend wood applications to optical components such as solar cells, screens, windows, magnetic materials, and luminescent and decorative materials. This review details the production of ETW and how the wood density, wood thickness, wood type, wood direction, cellulose volume fraction, extent and type of delignification, polymer type, functionalisation of ETW affect the morphological, functional, optical, thermal, photodegradation and mechanical properties of ETW.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据