4.7 Article

A facile approach for preparing nanofibrillated cellulose from bleached corn stalk with tailored surface functions

期刊

CELLULOSE
卷 30, 期 9, 页码 5641-5656

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10570-023-05234-4

关键词

Nanofabrillated cellulose; Surface modification; Mechanical shearing; Corn stalk; Mechanochemical activation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study proposed a simple, efficient, and energy-saving one-pot strategy to produce nanofibrillated cellulose (NFC) from bleached corn stalk and modify its surface. The effects of different surface functionalizations on the morphological, crystalline, chemical, and thermal properties of the NFC were investigated. The results showed that NFC produced through this strategy had a small diameter, long length, and functionalized surface, allowing for potential applications in various fields.
This study proposed a simple, efficient, and energy-saving one-pot strategy to produce nanofibrillated cellulose (NFC) from bleached corn stalk, with concurrent NFC surface modifications. Highspeed mechanical shearing and mechanochemical activation (urea/NaOH, oxalic acid, citric acid, and mercaptopropyl trimethoxysilane) were involved in the strategy. The effects of different surface functionalizations on the morphological, crystalline, chemical, and thermal properties of the NFC were investigated. The results suggested that the bleached corn stalk fibers were decomposed into microfibrils through intensive mechanical shearing. Each microfibril is associated with abundant branched and networked cellulose nanofibrils. NFC showed an average diameter of 23 nm and an average length of 1530 nm, with an aspect ratio of 67. The hydroxyl groups on the NFC surface were functionalized and modified by forming amide (urea/NaOH), carboxyl (oxalic acid/ citric acid), and hydrogen bond (mercaptopropyl trimethoxysilane), respectively. This novel one-pot strategy opens up new application areas for production and surface functionalization of nanocellulose.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据