4.4 Review

Promising applications of red cell distribution width in diagnosis and prognosis of diseases with or without disordered iron metabolism

期刊

CELL BIOLOGY INTERNATIONAL
卷 47, 期 7, 页码 1161-1169

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cbin.12029

关键词

disease diagnosis; disordered iron metabolism; ferritin; hepcidin; red cell distribution width

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Many indicators, including RDW and iron metabolism, are sensitive to various risk factors and are associated with pathological alterations and disease onset. Increased RDW indicates various conditions such as iron deficiency anemia and chronic inflammation. Understanding the factors affecting RDW, such as disordered iron metabolism and oxidative stress, can be valuable in diagnosing and monitoring pathological conditions.
Many indicators, including red cell distribution width (RDW) and iron metabolism, are sensitive to a variety of risk factors, and are associated with the pathological alterations and disease onset. RDW reflects the degree of heterogeneous volumes of peripheral red blood cells (RBCs). It has been well-known that increased RDW indicates iron deficiency anemia, hemolytic anemia, ineffective erythropoiesis, and shorten lifespan of RBCs. Increased RDW is also prevalent in various non-anemic pathological conditions and diseases. We here review the factors affecting RDW, particularly disordered iron metabolism, chronic inflammation, and oxidative stress, and recapitulate the interplays among these factors. Furthermore, we review the application of increased RDW together with disordered iron homeostasis and the deregulations of hepcidin expression and ferritin levels in the diagnoses and prognosis of anemic and nonanemic diseases. RDW is inexpensive and readily available and may be valuable in adding to the diagnosis and monitoring of many pathological conditions. RDW combined with other indicators, for example, hepcidin and ferritin levels, should be utilized more frequently in clinical practice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据