4.3 Article

Dobutamine stress echocardiography during transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair predicts residual mitral regurgitation

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ccd.30645

关键词

general anesthesia; imaging; MitraClip; percutaneous treatment; stress testing

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to determine whether low-dose dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) during transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair (TMVR) can predict residual mitral regurgitation (MR) at discharge. The results showed that an increase of MR during DSE can predict the presence of >moderate MR at discharge.
ObjectivesThe current study sought to determine whether low-dose dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) during transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair (TMVR) can predict residual mitral regurgitation (MR) at discharge. BackgroundIn most patients, TMVR can successfully reduce MR from severe to mild or moderate. However, general anesthesia during the intervention affects hemodynamics and MR assessment. At discharge transthoracic echocardiogram residual MR (>moderate) is present in 10%-30% of patients which is associated with worse clinical outcome. MethodsIn consecutive patients the severity of MR was determined at baseline, immediately after TMVR clip implantation and subsequently during low-dose DSE (both under general anesthesia) and at discharge. ResultsA total of 39 patients were included (mean age 76.1 +/- 8.1 years, 39% male, 56% functional MR, 41% left ventricular ejection fraction < 45%). An increase of MR during DSE was seen in 11 patients, of whom 6 (55%) showed >moderate MR at discharge. None of the 28 patients without an increase of MR during DSE showed >moderate MR at discharge. The diagnostic performance of the test could be established at a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 85% in unselected patients. ConclusionsDSE during TMVR is a useful tool to predict residual MR at discharge. It could support procedural decision making, including implantation of additional clips and thus potentially improve clinical outcome.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据