4.7 Article

Comparing in situ turbidity sensor measurements as a proxy for suspended sediments in North-Western European streams

期刊

CATENA
卷 225, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2023.107006

关键词

Turbidity; Optical sensor; Suspended sediments; Streams; Monitoring

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Climate change and land use alterations can cause significant changes in soil erosion and sediment fluxes in streams. Optical turbidity sensors can be used as a proxy for suspended sediment concentration (SSC), but there is a need for calibration. This study analyzed calibration data from 31 streams in Northern Europe to identify correlations between turbidity and SSC.
Climate change in combination with land use alterations may lead to significant changes in soil erosion and sediment fluxes in streams. Optical turbidity sensors can monitor with high frequency and can be used as a proxy for suspended sediment concentration (SSC) provided there is an acceptable calibration curve for turbidity measured by sensors and SSC from water samples. This study used such calibration data from 31 streams in 11 different research projects or monitoring programmes in six Northern European countries. The aim was to find patterns in the turbidity-SSC correlations based on stream characteristics such as mean and maximum turbidity and SSC, catchment area, land use, hydrology, soil type, topography, and the number and representativeness of the data that are used for the calibration. There were large variations, but the best correlations between turbidity and SSC were found in streams with a mean and maximum SSC of >30-200 mg/l, and a mean and maximum turbidity above 60-200 NTU/FNU, respectively. Streams draining agricultural areas with fine-grained soils had better correlations than forested streams draining more coarse-grained soils. However, the study also revealed considerable differences in methodological approaches, including analytical methods to determine SSC, water sampling strategies, quality control procedures, and the use of sensors based on different measuring principles. Relatively few national monitoring programmes in the six countries involved in the study included optical turbidity sensors, which may partly explain this lack of methodological harmonisation. Given the risk of future changes in soil erosion and sediment fluxes, increased harmonisation is highly recommended, so that turbidity data from optical sensors can be better evaluated and intercalibrated across streams in comparable geographical regions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据