4.7 Article

Pillared bentonite from Al-Fe-Cu polymeric precursor in solid state for the catalytic oxidation of amoxicillin

期刊

CATALYSIS TODAY
卷 418, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2023.114135

关键词

Pillared clay; Keggin polyhydroxycation; Al-Fe-Cu; Catalytic oxidation; Amoxicillin; Response surface; Box Behnken design

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A Colombian bentonite was successfully pillared with Al, Al-Fe, Al-Cu and Al-Fe-Cu polyhydroxications in solid state. The effect of the Fe and Cu content on the physicochemical properties of the pillared bentonite was evaluated. The optimized conditions were used to compare the catalytic performance of the catalysts, and pillared clay with AlFeCu10 showed the best performance.
A Colombian bentonite is successfully pillared with Al, Al-Fe, Al-Cu and Al-Fe-Cu polyhydroxications in solid state. The effect of the Fe and Cu content on the physicochemical properties of the pillared bentonite was evaluated using characterization techniques such as X-ray fluorescence (XRF), X-ray diffraction (XRD) and textural analysis (nitrogen physisorption). The Box-Behnken statistical experiment design was used to determine the optimal parameters of the independent variables hydrogen peroxide (0.120-0.144 M), catalyst load (0.5-1.5 g/L) and type of catalyst (PILC FeCu1, FeCu5, FeCu10) in the catalytic oxidation (CWPO) of amoxicillin. The optimized conditions of hydrogen peroxide (0.137 M) and catalyst loading (0.7 g/L) were used to compare the catalytic performance of the catalysts with 1%, 5% and 10% Al-Fe, Al-Cu and Al-Fe-Cu reaching a removal between 91% and 100% of amoxicillin at T and ambient pressure. The rate constants determined allowed the identification of the best catalyst of each series to study the degree of mineralization and choose the best catalyst: the pillared clay with AlFeCu10, with a TOC removal of 24.6% after 2 h of reaction. After three cycles of reuse, the catalyst maintained its catalytic activity in removing amoxicillin without leaching any metal.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据