4.8 Article

Fabrication of carbon dots intercalated MXene hybrids via laser treatment as oil-based additives for synergistic lubrication

期刊

CARBON
卷 205, 期 -, 页码 373-382

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2023.01.053

关键词

Catechol groups functionalization; Carbon dots; Synergistic lubrication

向作者/读者索取更多资源

As an emerging two-dimensional material, MXene exhibits excellent anti-friction and anti-wear properties in lubrication systems. However, its stable dispersion in base oil as an oil-based lubricant additive still faces challenges. Optimizing the microstructure has been proved to be effective in improving the stable dispersion of MXene in base oil.
As an emerging two-dimensional material, MXene exhibits excellent anti-friction and anti-wear properties in lubrication systems. However, as an oil-based lubricant additive, their stable dispersion in base oil still faces great challenges. Optimizing the microstructure has been proved to be an effective strategy to improve the stable dispersion of MXene in base oil. In this work, catechol groups functionalized carbon dots are synthesized suc- cessfully by pulsed laser irradiation of tannic acid in acetone, and then they are grafted onto MXene surface to obtain MXene@CDs hybrids via chemical bond between catechol groups of carbon dots and Ti-OH of MXene surface. Carbon dots not only increase the layer spacing of MXene nanosheets, reduce self-weight stacking, but also make it easier to slide between layers. When used as oil based lubricating additives, MXene@CDs can reduce the coefficient of friction of PAO 10 from 0.58 to 0.1, and the wear volume is reduced by 91.3%. Due to the shear - induced and self-healing mechanism, the special intercalation structure of MXene@CDs is easily formed a pro- tective film during the run-in period, which not only reduces the contact area of friction couples but also eliminates the polishing effect on the substrate surface, thus enabling synergistic lubrication.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据