4.7 Article

Facile fabrication of three-dimensional nanofibrous foams of cellulose@g-C3N4@Cu2O with superior visible-light photocatalytic performance

期刊

CARBOHYDRATE POLYMERS
卷 303, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2022.120455

关键词

Electrospinning; Nanofibrous foam; G-C3N4; Cu2O; Heterojunction; Photocatalyst

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A unique three-dimensional nanofibrous foam of cellulose@g-C3N4@Cu2O was prepared through electrospinning and foaming processes. The foam showed enhanced specific surface area and porosity due to the hydrogen gas generated from NaBH4 transforming the two-dimensional membrane. The foam exhibited high degradation efficiency for Congo Red dye and maintained its stability and cycling performance after multiple reuse cycles.
In this work, a unique three-dimensional nanofibrous foam of cellulose@g-C3N4@Cu2O was prepared via electrospinning followed by a foaming process. A cellulose solution in DMAc/LiCl containing g-C3N4 and CuSO4 was applied for electrospinning, while aqueous alkali was used as the coagulation bath. The solidification of electrospun cellulose/g-C3N4 nanofibers would be accompanied with in-situ formation of Cu(OH)(2) nanoparticles. Interestingly, the hydrogen gas (H-2) generated from NaBH4 could transform the two-dimensional membrane into a three-dimensional foam, leading to the increased specific surface area and porosity of the material. Meanwhile, the Cu(OH)(2) nanoparticles attached on the electrospun nanofibers were reduced to Cu2O to form a p-n heterostructure between Cu2O and g-C3N4. The as-prepared cellulose@g-C3N4@Cu2O foam exhibited a high degra-dation efficiency (99.5 %) for the dye of Congo Red under visible light radiation. And center dot O-2(-) was discovered to be the dominant reactive species responsive for dye degradation. Moreover, the cellulose@g-C3N4@Cu2O could maintain its initial degradation efficiency even after seven cycles of reuse, suggesting the excellent stability and cycling performance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据