4.2 Review

Updates in Risk Stratification in Myelodysplastic Syndromes

相关参考文献

注意:仅列出部分参考文献,下载原文获取全部文献信息。
Article Hematology

Distinguishing AML from MDS: a fixed blast percentage may no longer be optimal

Elihu Estey et al.

Summary: Including patients with 10% to 30% blasts (AML/MDS) in both AML and MDS studies would allow for testing the independent effect of blast percentage on outcome, provide more treatment options for patients, and potentially simplify the regulatory approval process.
Article Hematology

International Consensus Classification of Myeloid Neoplasms and Acute Leukemias: integrating morphologic, clinical, and genomic data

Daniel A. Arber et al.

Summary: In 2016, the WHO, Society for Hematopathology, and European Association for Haematopathology collaborated to update the classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemias, advancing the field of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemias.
Review Oncology

The 5th edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Haematolymphoid Tumours: Myeloid and Histiocytic/Dendritic Neoplasms

Joseph D. Khoury et al.

Summary: This paper summarizes the new WHO classification scheme for myeloid and histiocytic/dendritic neoplasms, emphasizing the refinement of diagnostic criteria and the importance of actionable biomarkers, while maintaining global applicability.

LEUKEMIA (2022)

Article Oncology

Therapy-related myelodysplastic syndromes deserve specific diagnostic sub-classification and risk-stratification-an approach to classification of patients with t-MDS

A. Kuendgen et al.

Summary: The study shows that therapy-related myelodysplastic syndromes (t-MDS) are as heterogeneous as primary MDS, and require the same careful differentiation regarding risk. Despite less favorable clinical outcomes in t-MDS subsets compared to primary MDS, classification and prognostic scoring effectively separated t-MDS patients into different risk groups.

LEUKEMIA (2021)

Article Hematology

It is time to shift the treatment paradigm in myelodysplastic syndromes: A focus on novel developments and current investigational approaches exploring combinatorial therapy in high-risk MDS

Luis E. Aguirre et al.

Summary: Therapeutic options for higher risk myelodysplastic syndromes have been limited, but recent developments in DNA sequencing have led to targeted drug development. Strategies such as disrupting protein ubiquitination, modulating macrophage activity, and blocking immune checkpoints show promise in improving treatment outcomes for high-risk MDS.

BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL HAEMATOLOGY (2021)

Article Oncology

Personalized Prediction Model to Risk Stratify Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Aziz Nazha et al.

Summary: This study developed a personalized prediction model for MDS patients using machine learning techniques and incorporating clinical and genomic data, which showed superior performance in predicting survival and leukemia transformation probabilities compared to established models. The model was validated in external cohorts, demonstrating its potential for dynamic and accurate prognostic predictions at different time points in a patient's disease course.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY (2021)

Review Oncology

Hypoplastic Myelodysplastic Syndromes: Just an Overlap Syndrome?

Bruno Fattizzo et al.

Summary: Hypoplastic myelodysplastic syndromes (hMDS) pose a diagnostic challenge, blending features of both MDS (dysplasia, genetic lesions, cytopenias) and aplastic anemia (low cellularity, autoimmunity). There are two potential hMDS phenotypes: one proinflammatory and autoimmune, resembling AA and responding to immunosuppression; the other MDS-like, dominated by genetic lesions and prone to leukemic evolution. Personalized treatment and monitoring based on the predominant hMDS phenotype may be beneficial for patient management.

CANCERS (2021)

Article Oncology

Classification and Personalized Prognostic Assessment on the Basis of Clinical and Genomic Features in Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Matteo Bersanelli et al.

Summary: The study identified eight distinct subgroups of MDS based on specific genomic features, each with different prognostic outcomes. By integrating clinical and genomic variables, a novel prognostic model was developed to provide personalized survival predictions for MDS patients. This model significantly improved the accuracy of current prognostic tools and has the potential to revolutionize disease classification and prognosis in the future.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY (2021)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Luspatercept in Patients with Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Pierre Fenaux et al.

NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE (2020)

Review Hematology

Genetics of MDS

Seishi Ogawa

Review Oncology

Clinical Implications of Genetic Mutations in Myelodysplastic Syndrome

James A. Kennedy et al.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY (2017)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Prognostic Mutations in Myelodysplastic Syndrome after Stem-Cell Transplantation

R. C. Lindsley et al.

NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE (2017)

Review Oncology

Therapy-related myeloid neoplasms: when genetics and environment collide

Megan E. McNerney et al.

NATURE REVIEWS CANCER (2017)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Somatic SF3B1 Mutation in Myelodysplasia with Ring Sideroblasts

E. Papaemmanuil et al.

NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE (2011)