4.6 Article

Respective roles of Pik3ca mutations and cyproterone acetate impregnation in mouse meningioma tumorigenesis

期刊

CANCER GENE THERAPY
卷 30, 期 8, 页码 1114-1123

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41417-023-00621-2

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Despite their rarity, PIK3CA mutations in meningiomas have raised interest as potentially targetable, ubiquitous mutations owing to their presence in sporadic benign and malignant tumors but also in hormone-related cases. The researchers used genetically engineered mouse models to demonstrate that Pik3ca mutations in postnatal meningeal cells are sufficient to promote meningioma formation but also tumor progression in mice. They also found that hormone impregnation fails to induce meningioma tumorigenesis while promoting breast tumor formation.
Despite their rarity, PIK3CA mutations in meningiomas have raised interest as potentially targetable, ubiquitous mutations owing to their presence in sporadic benign and malignant tumors but also in hormone-related cases. Using new genetically engineered mouse models, we here demonstrate that Pik3ca mutations in postnatal meningeal cells are sufficient to promote meningioma formation but also tumor progression in mice. Conversely, hormone impregnation, whether alone or in association with Pik3ca and Nf2 mutations, fails to induce meningioma tumorigenesis while promoting breast tumor formation. We then confirm in vitro the effect of Pik3ca mutations but not hormone impregnation on the proliferation of primary cultures of mouse meningeal cells. Finally, we show by exome analysis of breast tumors and meninges that hormone impregnation promotes breast tumor formation without additional somatic oncogenic mutation but is associated with an increased mutational burden on Pik3ca-mutant background. Taken together, these results tend to suggest a prominent role of Pik3ca mutations over hormone impregnation in meningioma tumorigenesis, the exact effect of the latter is still to be discovered.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据