4.5 Review

Colorectal cancer liver metastasis: genomic evolution and crosstalk with the liver microenvironment

期刊

CANCER AND METASTASIS REVIEWS
卷 42, 期 2, 页码 575-587

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10555-023-10107-0

关键词

Colorectal cancer liver metastasis; Genomic evolution; Tumor microenvironment; Tumor immune microenvironment; Tumor metabolism

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Colorectal cancer (CRC) patients often suffer from liver metastases, resulting in high mortality rates. The molecular basis and management of colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs) pose significant challenges in the clinic. Recent genomic evidence has revealed liver tropism in CRC and a stricter evolutionary bottleneck in the liver compared to lymph nodes. This organ-specific bottleneck challenges CRC cells and necessitates adaptation at both the genetic and phenotypic levels to interact with the hepatic microenvironment. Here, we review emerging evidence on the clonal evolution of CRLM and discuss recent insights into the molecular mechanisms behind the bidirectional interactions between metastatic CRC cells and the unique liver microenvironment.
Colorectal cancer (CRC) patients frequently develop liver metastases, which are the major cause of cancer-related mortality. The molecular basis and management of colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs) remain a challenging clinical issue. Recent genomic evidence has demonstrated the liver tropism of CRC and the presence of a stricter evolutionary bottleneck in the liver as a target organ compared to lymph nodes. This bottleneck challenging CRC cells in the liver is organ-specific and requires adaptation not only at the genetic level, but also at the phenotypic level to crosstalk with the hepatic microenvironment. Here, we highlight the emerging evidence on the clonal evolution of CRLM and review recent insights into the molecular mechanisms orchestrating the bidirectional interactions between metastatic CRC cells and the unique liver microenvironment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据