4.7 Review

Left Main Coronary Artery Disease

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
卷 68, 期 11, 页码 1233-1246

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.05.089

关键词

clinical decision making; coronary artery bypass; coronary disease; percutaneous coronary intervention; revascularization; stents

资金

  1. CardioVascular Research Foundation, Seoul, Korea [2015-09]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease is the highest-risk lesion subset of ischemic heart disease, and has traditionally been an indication for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Recent evidence suggests comparable clinical outcomes between percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and CABG for LMCA disease, with similar rates of mortality and serious composite outcomes, a higher rate of stroke with CABG, and a higher rate of repeat revascularization with PCI. These results have been translated to the current guideline recommendation that PCI is a reasonable alternative to CABG in patients with low to intermediate anatomic complexity. However, how the characteristics, treatment, and clinical outcomes of patients with unprotected LMCA disease have evolved over time has not yet been fully evaluated. We therefore described secular trends in the characteristics and long-term outcomes of unprotected LMCA disease using real-world clinical experience from the IRIS-MAIN (Interventional Research Incorporation Society-Left MAIN Revascularization) registry together with a broad review of this topic. (C) 2016 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据