4.4 Article

No free lunch: estimating the biomass and ex-vessel value of target catch lost to depredation by odontocetes in the Hawai?i longline tuna fishery

出版社

CANADIAN SCIENCE PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1139/cjfas-2022-0156

关键词

depredation; false killer whale; fisheries interactions; odontocete; pelagic longline fishery

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Depredation by marine predators in pelagic longline fisheries causes significant economic losses. This study used a novel modeling approach to estimate catch removal by odontocetes in the Hawai'i deep-set longline fishery and found that depredation resulted in approximately 100 tons of lost biomass and 1 million USD in economic value during 2012-2018. The study also identified spatiotemporal patterns and hotspots of depredation, providing valuable insights for assessing the impacts of depredation in similar fisheries.
Depredation by marine predators causes economic losses and impacts depredating species and fish stocks. To understand these impacts, it is important to accurately estimate catch losses from depredation. Pelagic longline fisheries are susceptible to depredation, and depredation is difficult to quantify, because gear is suspended in the water column away from the vessel for extended periods. In the present study, we used fisheries data and a novel modeling approach to estimate catch removal by odontocetes in the Hawai'i deep-set longline fishery. We estimated annual biomass and economic value lost to depredation of three of the most commonly landed species as approximately 100 t and 1 million USD, respectively, during 2012-2018. The median cost on sets when depredation occurred was $600 USD, with the worst 10% of sets experiencing losses exceeding $2300 USD. We also identified broad-scale spatiotemporal patterns and hotspots of depredation across the range of the fishery. Our findings quantify the ecological and economic implications of this interaction, and our methods can be applied in similar fisheries elsewhere to assess the impacts of depredation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据