4.7 Article

TIMER is a Siamese neural network-based framework for identifying both general and species-specific bacterial promoters

期刊

BRIEFINGS IN BIOINFORMATICS
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbad209

关键词

bacterial promoter; bioinformatics; prediction; machine learning; deep learning; Siamese neural networks

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, we developed TIMER, a Siamese neural network-based approach for identifying both general and species-specific bacterial promoters. TIMER achieves a competitive performance and outperforms several existing methods on both general and species-specific promoter prediction.
Background: Promoters are DNA regions that initiate the transcription of specific genes near the transcription start sites. In bacteria, promoters are recognized by RNA polymerases and associated sigma factors. Effective promoter recognition is essential for synthesizing the gene-encoded products by bacteria to grow and adapt to different environmental conditions. A variety of machine learning-based predictors for bacterial promoters have been developed; however, most of them were designed specifically for a particular species. To date, only a few predictors are available for identifying general bacterial promoters with limited predictive performance.Results: In this study, we developed TIMER, a Siamese neural network-based approach for identifying both general and species-specific bacterial promoters. Specifically, TIMER uses DNA sequences as the input and employs three Siamese neural networks with the attention layers to train and optimize the models for a total of 13 species-specific and general bacterial promoters. Extensive 10-fold cross-validation and independent tests demonstrated that TIMER achieves a competitive performance and outperforms several existing methods on both general and species-specific promoter prediction. As an implementation of the proposed method, the web server of TIMER is publicly accessible at .

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据