4.5 Article

A guide to the collection of T-cells by apheresis for ATMP manufacturing-recommendations of the GoCART coalition apheresis working group

期刊

BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION
卷 58, 期 7, 页码 742-748

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41409-023-01957-x

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Autologous CAR-T cells offer significant benefits for refractory malignancies. Hospitals not previously involved in immune effector cell therapy will need to develop capacity and expertise to integrate CAR-T cells. The GoCART Coalition aims to disseminate knowledge and skills, standardize management and documentation, and benchmark clinical results of CAR-T cell recipients. This guide provides initial suggestions for apheresis readiness and starting material collection, but comprehensive training is necessary for compliance with regulations and assessment of cellular composition and safety.
Autologous chimeric antigen receptor-modified T-cells (CAR-T) provide meaningful benefit for otherwise refractory malignancies. As clinical indications for CAR-T cells are expanding, hospitals hitherto not active in the field of immune effector cell therapy will need to build capacity and expertise. The GoCART Coalition seeks to disseminate knowledge and skills to facilitate the introduction of CAR-T cells and to standardize management and documentation of CAR-T cell recipients, in order to optimize outcomes and to be able to benchmark clinical results against other centers. Apheresis generates the starting material for CAR-T cell manufacturing. This guide provides some initial suggestions for patient's apheresis readiness and performance to collect starting material and should thus facilitate the implementation of a CAR-T-starting material apheresis facility. It cannot replace, of course, the extensive training needed to perform qualitative apheresis collections in compliance with national and international regulations and assess their cellular composition and biological safety.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据