4.6 Article

Benefits of physical activity on reproductive health functions among polycystic ovarian syndrome women: a systematic review

期刊

BMC PUBLIC HEALTH
卷 23, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12889-023-15730-8

关键词

Exercise; Physical activity; Polycystic syndrome; Reproduction

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This systematic review aimed to synthesize the evidence on the effects of physical activity on reproductive health functions among PCOS women. The findings suggest that physical activity can improve reproductive functions and reduce infertility, as well as social and psychological stress among women with PCOS.
BackgroundPolycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is among the predominant endocrine disorders of reproductive-aged women. The prevalence of PCOS has been estimated at approximately 6-26%, affecting 105 million people worldwide. This systematic review aimed to synthesize the evidence on the effects of physical activity on reproductive health functions among PCOS women.MethodsThe systematic review includes randomization-controlled trials (RCTs) on physical exercise and reproductive functions among women with PCOS. Studies in the English language published between January 2010 and December 2022 were identified via PubMed. A combination of medical subject headings in terms of physical activity, exercise, menstrual cycle, hyperandrogenism, reproductive hormone, hirsutism, and PCOS was used.ResultsOverall, seven RCTs were included in this systematic review. The studies investigated interventions of physical activity of any intensity and volume and measured reproductive functions and hormonal and menstrual improvement. The inclusion of physical activity alone or in combination with other therapeutic interventions improved reproductive outcomes.ConclusionThe reproductive functions of women with PCOS can be improved with physical activity. Furthermore, physical activity can also reduce infertility, as well as social and psychological stress among women.PROSPERO systematic review registrationCRD42020213732.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据