4.6 Article

Say it right: measuring the impact of different communication strategies on the decision to get vaccinated

期刊

BMC PUBLIC HEALTH
卷 23, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12889-023-16047-2

关键词

Vaccines; Vaccination hesitancy; Surveys and questionnaires; Random allocation; Health communication

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Vaccine hesitancy is a concerning threat to the control of vaccine-preventable diseases. Effective health communication can promote understanding of the importance, risks, and benefits of vaccination and reduce vaccine hesitancy. This study found that communication strategies focusing on vaccine safety/efficacy with case descriptions and images have a greater impact on reducing vaccine hesitancy.
BackgroundVaccine hesitancy is a concerning menace to the control of vaccine-preventable diseases. Effective health communication could promote an overall understanding of the importance, risks, and benefits of vaccination and reduce vaccine hesitancy.MethodsIn this survey, four fictitious newspaper articles addressing an emerging bogus disease and its vaccine were randomly assigned to participants. The first version focused on information about the disease; the second was akin to the first, including a case description and image. The third version focused on vaccine safety/efficacy; the fourth version was like the third, including a case description and image. After reading a single version of the article, participants responded if they would take the vaccine and if they would vaccinate their children. We used chi-squared tests for comparisons and investigated interactions with vaccine-hesitant attitudes.ResultsWe included 5233 participants between August/2021 and January/2022; 790 were caregivers of a child <= 5 years old, and 15% had prior vaccine hesitancy. Although most declared intention to take the vaccine, the percentage was highest among those exposed to the newspaper article focusing on the vaccine safety/efficacy with the case description and picture (91%; 95% confidence interval 89-92%), and lowest among participants exposed to the article focusing on the disease with no case description (84%; 95% confidence interval 82-86%). Similar trends were observed in the intention of offspring vaccination. We found evidence of effect modification by vaccine-hesitant attitudes, with a higher impact of communication focusing on vaccine safety/efficacy compared to that focusing on disease characteristics among hesitant participants.ConclusionCommunication strategies focusing on different aspects of the disease-vaccine duet may impact vaccine hesitancy, and storytelling/emotive imagery descriptions may improve risk perception and vaccine uptake. Moreover, the effect of message framing strategies may differ according to previous vaccine hesitant attitudes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据