4.5 Review

Use of artesunate in the treatment of severe imported malaria in France: review of the effectiveness and real-life safety in two French university hospitals

期刊

BMC INFECTIOUS DISEASES
卷 23, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12879-023-08260-6

关键词

Artesunate; Malaria; Safety; Imported malaria; Adverse events

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study assessed the real-life effectiveness and safety of intravenous artesunate (AS) in the treatment of severe imported malaria (SIM) in two hospitals in France. The study found that AS demonstrated good efficacy and safety in non-endemic areas. Accelerated administrative procedures are needed to obtain full registration and facilitate access to AS in France.
BackgroundIntravenous artesunate (AS) is the first-line treatment for patients with severe imported malaria (SIM) worldwide. However, after 10 years of use in France, AS hasn't yet received marketing authorization.The purpose of this study was to assess the real-life effectiveness and safety of AS in the treatment of SIM in two Hospitals in France.MethodsWe performed a bicenter retrospective and observational study. All patients treated with AS for SIM between 2014 and 2018 and 2016-2020 were included. The effectiveness of AS was evaluated by parasite clearance, number of deaths, and the length of hospital stay. The real-life safety was assessed by related adverse events (AE) and monitoring of biological blood parameters during the hospital stay and follow-up period.Results110 patients were included during the six-year study period. 71.8% of patients were parasite-negative of their day 3 thick and thin blood smears after AS treatment. No patients discontinued AS due to an AE and no serious AE were declared. Two cases of delayed post-artesunate hemolysis occurred and required blood transfusions.ConclusionThis study highlights effectiveness and safety of AS in non-endemic areas. Administrative procedures must be accelerated in order to obtain full registration and facilitate access to AS in France.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据