4.3 Article

Assessment of autoantibodies in paediatric population with primary immunodeficiencies: a pilot study

期刊

BMC IMMUNOLOGY
卷 24, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12865-023-00543-6

关键词

Autoantibody; Autoimmunity; Coeliac disease; Immune dysregulation; Inborn errors of immunity; Primary immunodeficiency

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the prevalence of autoantibodies in paediatric PID population and suggests that certain autoantibodies may be useful for screening and diagnosing autoimmune diseases in PID patients.
BackgroundThe correlation between primary immunodeficiencies (PIDs) and autoimmunity shows ethnic and geographical diversity. The aim of our study was to accumulate more data in paediatric PID population.Methods58 children aged 1-17 and with PID (study group) and 14 age-matched immunocompetent individuals (control group) were included in the study. Serum levels of 17 different specific IgG antibodies against autoantigens were measured by means of a quantitative enzyme immunoassay. Immunoglobulin levels were analysed in relation to a detailed medical examination.ResultsAutoantibodies against one or more antigens were detected in the sera of 24.14% (n = 14) subjects in the study group. The most frequent were anti-thyroid peroxidase (anti-TPO) antibodies (n = 8; 13.8%). Anti-TPO antibody levels were elevated more often in PID patients with a positive family history of autoimmune diseases (p = 0.04). The screening for anti-deamidated gliadin peptide (DGP) and anti-tissue transglutaminase (tTG) antibodies in our series allowed identifying two previously undiagnosed cases of coeliac disease in PID patients. There was no statistically significant difference between the study and the control group in terms of the autoantibodies prevalence.ConclusionsThis study provides data on the prevalence of autoantibodies in paediatric population diagnosed with PID. Selected autoantibodies (i.e. anti-tTG, anti-DGP) might be useful for the screening of PID to avoid the delay of diagnosis of an autoimmune disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据