4.6 Article

Empowering biologists to decode omics data: the Genekitr R package and web server

期刊

BMC BIOINFORMATICS
卷 24, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12859-023-05342-9

关键词

Bioinformatics tool; Web server; Gene set enrichment analysis; Non-programming bioinformatics; Plotting

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Researchers have developed an R package and a web server called Genekitr to assist biologists in exploring large gene sets. Genekitr includes four modules: gene information retrieval, ID conversion, enrichment analysis, and publication-ready plotting. This tool makes bioinformatics tasks accessible to non-programming scientists.
BackgroundA variety of high-throughput analyses, such as transcriptome, proteome, and metabolome analysis, have been developed, producing unprecedented amounts of omics data. These studies generate large gene lists, of which the biological significance shall be deeply understood. However, manually interpreting these lists is difficult, especially for non-bioinformatics-savvy scientists.ResultsWe developed an R package and a corresponding web server-Genekitr, to assist biologists in exploring large gene sets. Genekitr comprises four modules: gene information retrieval, ID (identifier) conversion, enrichment analysis and publication-ready plotting. Currently, the information retrieval module can retrieve information on up to 23 attributes for genes of 317 organisms. The ID conversion module assists in ID-mapping of genes, probes, proteins, and aliases. The enrichment analysis module organizes 315 gene set libraries in different biological contexts by over-representation analysis and gene set enrichment analysis. The plotting module performs customizable and high-quality illustrations that can be used directly in presentations or publications.ConclusionsThis web server tool will make bioinformatics more accessible to scientists who might not have programming expertise, allowing them to perform bioinformatics tasks without coding.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据