4.6 Article

bTUNED: transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation for neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction

期刊

BJU INTERNATIONAL
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/bju.16081

关键词

tibial nerve stimulation; transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation; neuro-urology; neuromodulation; neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction; neurogenic detrusor overactivity; clinical trial protocol

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study protocol describes a randomized controlled trial investigating the efficacy and safety of transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) for refractory neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUTD). The primary outcome is improvement in bladder diary variables at study end compared to baseline values. Secondary outcomes include urodynamic, neurophysiological, and bowel function measures, as well as safety assessments.
Objective: To present the protocol for a randomized controlled trial (RCT) evaluating the efficacy and safety of transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) for refractory neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUTD).Study Design and Results: bTUNED (bladder and TranscUtaneous tibial Nerve stimulation for nEurogenic lower urinary tract Dysfunction) is an international multicentre, sham-controlled, double-blind RCT investigating the efficacy and safety of TTNS. The primary outcome is success of TTNS, defined as improvements in key bladder diary variables at study end compared to baseline values. The focus of the treatment is defined by the Self-Assessment Goal Achievement (SAGA) questionnaire. Secondary outcomes are the effect of TTNS on urodynamic, neurophysiological, and bowel function outcome measures, as well as the safety of TTNS.Conclusions: A total of 240 patients with refractory NLUTD will be included and randomized 1:1 into the verum or sham TTNS group from March 2020 until August 2026. TTNS will be performed twice a week for 30 min during 6 weeks. The patients will attend baseline assessments, 12 treatment visits and follow-up assessments at the study end.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据