4.3 Article

Optimization of carotenoid production by Umbelopsis ramanniana

期刊

BIOTECHNOLOGY PROGRESS
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/btpr.3369

关键词

Box-Behnken design; carotenoids; Plackett-Burman design; response surface methods; Umbelopsis ramanniana

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, Umbelopsis ramanniana was investigated to enhance carotenoid production. Various carbon and nitrogen sources were evaluated, with KNO3 and lactose being the most effective nitrogen and carbon sources, respectively. The optimization of medium components was achieved using Plackett-Burman design, and Box-Behnken response surface methodology was applied to further optimize carotenoid and biomass production. The optimum conditions for maximum carotenoid and biomass production were determined as a lactose concentration of 32.42 g/L, a carbon to nitrogen ratio of 20:1, and a shaking speed of 130 rpm, resulting in a significant increase in carotenoid and biomass production.
Umbelopsis ramanniana was investigated to increase carotenoid production. Nine different carbon sources and six different nitrogen sources were evaluated for the maximum carotenoid production. The most effective nitrogen and carbon sources were KNO3 and lactose, respectively. Then, the optimization of medium components for enhancement of carotenoid production by Umbelopsis ramanniana was achieved using Plackett-Burman design. Box-Behnken response surface methodology was applied to further optimize carotenoid and biomass production. Carbon to nitrogen ratio, lactose concentration, and shaking speed were studied as variables in Box-Behnken design. The optimum conditions for carotenoid and biomass production were determined as 32.42 g/L of lactose concentration, 20:1 of carbon to nitrogen ratio, and shaking speed of 130 rpm. The maximum carotenoid and biomass production under optimized conditions were 1141 mu g/L (beta-carotene-Eq) and 13.14 g/L, respectively. When compared to the control fermentation, carotenoid, and biomass production were increased by about 2 and 1.3 folds, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据