4.6 Article

Quorum sensing-based metabolic engineering of the precursor supply in Streptomyces coelicolor to improve heterologous production of neoaureothin

期刊

BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOENGINEERING
卷 120, 期 7, 页码 2039-2044

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/bit.28400

关键词

heterologous production; metabolic engineering; neoaureothin; polyketide; quorum sensing; Streptomyces

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A self-regulated metabolic engineering system was developed to enhance the production of polyketides in Streptomyces bacteria, resulting in a 4-fold increase in productivity. This system, based on quorum sensing, successfully regulated precursor biosynthesis without affecting cell growth.
Streptomyces are important industrial bacteria that produce pharmaceutically valuable polyketides. However, mass production on an industrial scale is limited by low productivity, which can be overcome through metabolic engineering and the synthetic biology of the host strain. Recently, the introduction of an auto-inducible expression system depending on microbial physiological state has been suggested as an important tool for the industrial-scale production of polyketides. In this study, titer improvement by enhancing the pool of CoA-derived precursors required for polyketide production was driven in a quorum sensing (QS)-dependent manner. A self-sustaining and inducer-independent regulatory system, named the QS-based metabolic engineering of precursor pool (QMP) system, was constructed, wherein the expression of genes involved in precursor biosynthesis was regulated by the QS-responsive promoter, scbAp. The QMP system was applied for neoaureothin production in a heterologous host, Streptomyces coelicolor M1152, and productivity increased by up to 4-fold. In particular, the engineered hyperproducers produced high levels of neoaureothin without adversely affecting cell growth. Overall, this study showed that self-regulated metabolic engineering mediated by QS has the potential to engineer strains for polyketide titer improvement.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据