4.8 Article

New trends in methyl salicylate sensing and their implications in agriculture

期刊

BIOSENSORS & BIOELECTRONICS
卷 223, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2022.115008

关键词

Methyl salicylate sensing; Methyl salicylate monitoring; Chemical sensor; Biosensor; Gas sensor; Plant protection

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Methyl salicylate (MeSal) is a crucial marker for early plant disease detection, and chemical sensors provide an alternative for its monitoring. Electrochemical and conductometric sensors are the most promising concepts for MeSal determination, but other technologies such as mass-sensitive and spectrophotometric principles also show promise. The key elements in these sensing technologies are the receptor elements or sensitive materials, including bioreceptors such as enzymes or polymers.
Methyl salicylate (MeSal) is an organic compound present in plants during stress events and is therefore a key marker for early plant disease detection. It has usually been detected by conventional methods that require bulky and costly equipment, such as gas chromatography or mass spectrometry. Currently, however, chemical sensors provide an alternative for MeSal monitoring, showing good performance for its determination in the vapour or liquid phase. The most promising concepts used in MeSal determination include sensors based on electrochemical and conductometric principles, although other technologies based on mass-sensitive, microwave, or spectrophotometric principles also show promise. The receptor elements or sensitive materials are shown to be part of the key elements in these sensing technologies. A literature survey identified a significant contribution of bioreceptors, including enzymes, odourant-binding proteins or peptides, as well as receptors based on polymers or inorganic materials in MeSal determination. This work reviews these concepts and materials and discusses their future prospects and limitations for application in plant health monitoring.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据